During Thursday’s broadcast of CNN’s “Laura Coates Live,” Rep. Angie Craig (D-MN) addressed questions about whether Democrats would consider a government shutdown as leverage in efforts to limit the authority of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The exchange came amid early discussion of upcoming budget negotiations and broader debates over immigration enforcement and executive authority.
Host Laura Coates asked directly, “Congresswoman, we’re hearing that some Democrats are threatening to shut down the government unless Congress tries to curb some of the powers from ICE. It’s very unlikely, as you said, that Republicans would join in and support that. But do you support that idea?” The question reflected ongoing uncertainty over how immigration policy could intersect with must-pass funding legislation later this month.
Craig responded by pointing to the budget process and internal party deliberations rather than outlining a specific course of action. “Well, look, I think we’re going to get into those budget discussions here later this month,” she said. She added that she views current administration actions as problematic, stating, “Look, I think the lack of following the rule of law by this administration is egregious.” While not explicitly endorsing a shutdown, Craig indicated that procedural leverage remains a consideration, saying that “all options have to be on the table.”
Craig also emphasized the role of party leadership in shaping strategy, noting that House Democrats would look to Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY) and other leaders for direction. She drew a comparison to prior messaging efforts, explaining that Democrats would proceed “just like we did when we made sure that the American people knew that the affordability crisis is on — especially related to healthcare — is on the backs of this Republican Party.”
The remarks come as Congress approaches another funding deadline, a recurring point of tension in recent years. Government shutdowns occur when lawmakers fail to pass appropriations or continuing resolutions, temporarily halting nonessential federal operations. Historically, these standoffs have raised questions about executive authority, congressional leverage, and the downstream effects on federal agencies, workers, and the public.
ICE, which operates under the Department of Homeland Security, has been a focal point in immigration policy debates due to its enforcement role and discretionary powers. Any attempt to limit those authorities through budget negotiations would place immigration enforcement alongside broader fiscal considerations, including federal spending levels and program priorities. As budget talks move forward, Craig’s comments illustrate how immigration, healthcare costs, and adherence to statutory processes are being discussed within the context of congressional funding decisions.
